Bruce Sonnen pulls out the math, like he's done it a hundred times, because he probably has. "We touch the vines up here in Oregon about 15 to 17 times a year," said the owner of Van Duzer Vineyards in the Willamette Valley. "If you can save 10 or 15 cents per touch per vine, and there are 1,300 vines per acre, multiply that over 100 acres...you could save $10,000 really, really quick. Do that five or six times in the growing season, and you just saved $50,000."
For a grower who can't sell fruit at last year's prices or, in some cases, can't sell it at all, that math isn't incremental. It's the difference between staying in business or not.
Sonnen knows both sides of that equation. Van Duzer has had grape contracts rescinded three years running. In 2025, nine acres of vineyard were removed. Just recently, Sonnen pulled the trigger on another block that tested positive for two vine viruses. Three years ago, rather than replant 20 acres of lower-performing flat Pinot Noir ground, he converted it to hazelnuts. "We didn't need more Pinot Noir that we couldn't sell," he explained. He is not alone. Across California and the Pacific Northwest, vineyard operators are making hard decisions about which acres to keep, which to pull and how to farm what remains at a cost structure that pencils out. Automation has increasingly become a central part of that answer, not as an investment in some future efficiency but as a practical, near-term tool to survive a brutal market cycle.
The pressure driving that shift is well-documented. Audra Cooper, vice president at Turrentine Brokerage, is direct about where this leaves the most financially stretched growers: "The people who were taking below-break-even prices two years ago can no longer do that in 2026. Their banks are making that decision for them."
Labor is the dominant cost variable, and it shows no sign of softening. In Oregon, the minimum wage is indexed to inflation, and a new overtime law that drops the threshold from 48 to 40 hours per week takes effect next year. In California, a Cal Poly study puts regulatory costs alone at $1,700 per acre in Napa, and that's before anyone sets foot in a vine row.
"We have to have transparent conversations," Cooper said, "and it's really difficult to have those transparent conversations."
The types of growers and vineyard managers who are taking an honest look at these difficult situations and acting on what the numbers say are often the ones turning to automation.
Where the wine industry stands
The 2026 WineBusiness Monthly Vineyard Survey offers a useful snapshot of where automation adoption sits, as well as how much is left to be done.
The most automated vineyard functions today are in-row, under-vine cultivation (23.5% of respondents), harvesting (18.4%), leafing (17.9%) and pre-pruning (14.7%). At the other end of the spectrum, precision canopy work, including cluster thinning (0.4%), shoot thinning (1.2%) and pruning (2.1%), remain almost entirely manual, which makes sense given the skill and site-specific judgment those tasks require.
Looking ahead to the coming year, 72.4% of all survey respondents have no plans to add automation this year. While it sounds negative, that means roughly one in three growers is actively considering it, which is still a meaningful number, and it does not take into account those who have already made the switch. The Pacific Northwest stands out as the most automation-forward region, with only 60.2% of PNW respondents saying "none of the above" for 2026 plans. The Central Coast follows at 63.8%. East of the Rockies trails furthest behind at 78.5%.
Winery size shapes the picture too. The smallest operations (those producing under 1,000 cases) are the most resistant, with 85.5% reporting no new automation plans. Mid-size operations in the 5,000-49,999-case range are the most active, with 37% planning some form of new automation this year.
Ag tech has grown up
For growers who lived through the first wave of agricultural technology, the current landscape looks reassuringly different.
Greg Gonzales, director of agriculture operations for Bien Nacido, Solomon Hills and Carlyle Farming Company, has been at this long enough to have seen the full arc. "We went from overnight ag tech startups that didn't make it as a business," he observed during a panel on vineyard and winery automation at WiVi Central Coast 2026, "to now we're actually in a very stable environment when it comes to providers who have been around for even 10-plus years now."
The shape of the industry has changed too, from companies promising to be everything to everyone, to specialists who do one thing well and partner with others to fill the gaps. Established equipment brands, including major tractor manufacturers, are entering the space, which Gonzales sees as a stabilizing force. "That gives us the strength and a foundation to then move a startup into a productive environment," he said. "Most of what we have now is very ready, set and go."
John Deere is the most prominent example. The company, which acquired autonomous farming startup Bear Flag Robotics in 2021 for $250 million, launched its 5ML autonomous orchard and vineyard tractor this year, a narrow-profile machine equipped with seven cameras, LiDAR sensors and real-time obstacle detection designed specifically for navigating vine rows. It also markets GUSS, an autonomous vineyard sprayer that allows a single operator to manage up to eight machines simultaneously from a laptop.
But Gonzales is careful to add a caveat that applies to every technology discussed in this article: "Technology can either enhance something good or enhance something really bad." The prerequisite isn't budget. It's operational clarity.
Click HERE to read the full article.